Auracelle Orion v4 · Cyber Governance Wargaming Simulation
E-AGPO-HT v2.0 · EVANS 2026 · AURACELLE AI GOVERNANCE LABS · PROPRIETARY IP · GENEVA CYBER CONFERENCE · MAY 2026
1
Intel
2
Decision
3
Consequence
4
After-Action
85
DEFENDER
12
ADVERSARY
T-0
TURN
🎯
MIRAGE CHAIN
Software supply-chain compromise cascading to ICS/OT — SolarWinds-class · w_IFD=0.25 · w_SWD=0.40 · λ=0.15
SC-SBOM
SC-CONC
🏛️
Governance Threshold Met
0.72
Ψ_v2 FINAL DECISION-PATH QUALITY
Your governance decisions maintained resilience above the stability floor.
Ψ_v2 — Decision Quality
0.74
DECISION-PATH QUALITY · WIN THRESHOLD: 0.50
Governance Confidence
Technical Resilience82%
TECHNICAL RESILIENCE
Composite of detection capability, infrastructure hardening, and patch velocity. Declines when you accept operational risk options or defer technical remediation.
Stratum I → SAD + SRA → Stratum II
Regulatory Compliance74%
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Reflects adherence to NIS2, EO 14028, CISA KEV, and EU CRA obligations. Rises when you choose options that mandate SBOM delivery or formal vendor notification. Falls when you accept risk without documentation.
Drives: Q_norm component of Ψ_v2
Diplomatic Coordination65%
DIPLOMATIC COORDINATION
Inter-institutional coordination quality with allied CSIRTs, NATO partners, and international bodies. Rises when you choose options involving STIX/TAXII sharing or allied briefings. Key for Geneva context.
Drives: Q_coord component of Ψ_v2
Public / Sector Trust70%
PUBLIC / SECTOR TRUST
Stakeholder and public confidence in institutional governance. Declines when incidents are poorly communicated or when operational disruption is high. Feeds cultural acceptance index.
Drives: Q_norm + cultural acceptance · Stratum I
Supply Chain Trust (τ̄)88%
SUPPLY CHAIN TRUST (τ̄)
Mean τ (tau) trust score across the vendor dependency tree. Aggregates τ_bridge (IFD path) and τ_edge (SWD path). When this falls below 0.40 the SCTL cascade threshold approaches — catastrophic multi-domain failure becomes probable.
⚠ CRITICAL <0.40 · Drives: g-GCC master score
Regulatory Obligations
EO 14028 · SBOM Delivery
Compliant — coverage 85%
EO 14028 · SBOM DELIVERY
Executive Order 14028 mandates machine-readable SBOMs for software sold to the US federal government. Your decisions in-game affect SBOM coverage — deferring vendor audits reduces this score toward non-compliance.
Compliant ≥80% · At-risk 60–80% · Non-compliant <60%
NIS2 · 72hr Notification
Window open — not triggered
NIS2 · 72-HOUR NOTIFICATION
EU NIS2 Directive requires notification to national authorities within 72 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident. Each turn represents roughly 6–12 hours. Choosing containment-only options without notification triggers non-compliance.
Window opens on T-1 detection · Expires T-6 (~72hr)
CISA KEV · Patch SLA
3 entries approaching 14d SLA
CISA KEV · PATCH SLA
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog mandates patching within 14 days for federal agencies. Three entries approaching SLA means your PATCH-VEL will decline if you deprioritise remediation options in upcoming turns.
SLA breach directly degrades PATCH-VEL and Q_sctl
EU CRA · Vendor Contracts
SBOM obligations: 6/9 vendors
EU CYBER RESILIENCE ACT · VENDOR CONTRACTS
The EU CRA requires vendors of digital products to maintain and deliver SBOMs and disclose vulnerabilities. 6 of 9 vendors are contractually obligated — 3 remain outside scope, creating SC-CONC exposure that decisions can close or widen.
Full compliance = 9/9 · Drives SC-CONC HHI trajectory
Policy Stress
Cultural Acceptance71%
CULTURAL ACCEPTANCE
Societal and organisational willingness to accept governance interventions — monitoring expansion, vendor restrictions, mandatory disclosure. Low acceptance raises the political cost of technically correct decisions.
Stratum I NOF · feeds Q_norm · E-AGPO-HT Stratum II
Misinformation Pressure28%
MISINFORMATION PRESSURE
Active adversarial narrative operations degrading public attribution confidence and allied consensus. Rising pressure reduces the decision window before political constraints override technical response options.
⚠ HIGH >50% erodes Q_coord and public trust simultaneously
Allied Coord. Quality68%
ALLIED COORDINATION QUALITY
Real-time quality of CSIRT-to-CSIRT and NATO/UN partner coordination. Reflects shared threat intelligence fidelity, notification timeliness, and joint response alignment. Central to Budapest Convention supply chain provisions.
Drives: Q_coord · IIC Stratum II capability · Ψ_v2
Turn Decision Log
Decisions appear here
Auracelle Orion v4
CYBER GOVERNANCE WARGAMING SIMULATION · GENEVA CYBER CONFERENCE · MAY 2026

Auracelle Orion v4 is a turn-based cyber governance wargaming simulation that stress-tests policy decisions across realistic supply chain attack scenarios. Each 5-turn scenario compresses a full incident lifecycle — from initial SCTL entry through governance consolidation — into a structured decision environment that quantifies the quality of your governance choices using the E-AGPO-HT v2.0 framework.

E-AGPO-HT v2.0 — MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATION

The simulation is powered by the E-AGPO-HT v2.0 framework (Evans AI Governance Policy Optimization - Human-Technology interaction), a proprietary 3-stratum wargaming intelligence architecture. The g-GCC (General Governance Wargaming Capacity) master score at Stratum III aggregates 7 BGC capabilities and 4 ACC AI factors from Stratum II, which are in turn driven by ~40 Narrow Operational Factors at Stratum I. Decision quality is scored by Ψ_v2 — a composite index across technical, normative, coordinative, structural, adaptive, and diplomatic governance dimensions.

HOW TO PLAY
① Spend intel tokens to reveal hidden info  ② Choose from 4 governance options  ③ Review E-AGPO-HT consequences  ④ Aim Ψ_v2 ≥ 0.50 · Load your own governance artifacts to personalise the baseline
POLICY RELEVANCE
Calibrated against NIS2, EO 14028, CISA KEV, EU CRA, and Budapest Convention supply chain provisions. Designed for NATO, UN, and national CSIRT policy contexts.
Auracelle AI Governance Labs · Director & Principal Investigator: Grace Evans
UC Berkeley CLTC Non-Resident Senior Fellow · Bath Spa University PhD Candidate
© 2026 Grace Evans · Proprietary IP · All rights reserved
📋
Governance Artifact Analysis
E-AGPO-HT v2.0 FRAMEWORK MAPPING · STRESS-TEST BASELINE
Analysing document…